the Miscellaneous Feminist

Reformed misogynist and recently realised queer – or "miscellaneous" gendered, as she prefers – Fury is all about personal voice, atonement, empathy and explanation

Month: November, 2013

The Word Feminism Pt 1

I’ve had many conversations with people who complain about the word Feminism.

The most frustrating are those white, cis gendered, straight men, who don’t feel represented under the banner of Feminism because they believe Feminism is only about women, and, in a world where so much attention is lavished on male-only arenas1, this is somehow unfair.

If they’ve decided to make an effort for the cause, the conversation usually devolves to them complaining that Feminists never make them feel welcomed – and of course not feeling welcomed & their feelings of being ostracised can’t possibly be because they, themselves, are doing something to deserve being levelled.

They, in my experience, tend to then tell Feminists that if Feminists want to effect change, they are going about it the wrong way. This is kind of an odd accusation. It’s a white, cis gendered, straight man telling a group that doesn’t represent them how to do things better for them.

I mean, I know narcissism is a thing, but that is kind of ridiculous.

It also implies that Feminism should take into account the feelings of said cis gendered, straight men – which is a bit rich, considering more often than not they’ve wandered into a Feminist space and said something hurtful or inconsiderate. Then, instead of examining what they might have done to incite fury, they immediately lay the demand for change at the feet of someone else.

That’s…  not how this works.

I read something recently that said that Feminists shouldn’t pander to cws men (in particular) who demand everything be stopped so that they can have an explanation and, in effect, be up to date/included on the conversation. This post is kind of in agreement with that. There’s something very backwards to pandering to people who want information spoon-fed. Feminists are not responsible for the education of everyone – we are too busy pushing for change to be spending time educating people on why.

There are many people I just tell to fuck off. I have limited energy explaining why their unexamined notions are so silly and hurtful – mostly I reserve it for my mates and people that I have within my social sphere; people I care about and value.

A friend of mine who I had a go at had a go back at me because he felt like I was “targetting” him. I denied it at the time but it’s true in a way, I suppose. I want my friends to be better people and I know they’re capable of it. I get surprised and hurt when they can’t see what they’re doing to me. I get surprised and hurt when I tell them that I don’t want to exist in a space that hurts me, they have a go.

My point is, I suppose, is that misogyny & patriarchy is a deeply self protecting thing that has instilled in us all the ability to demean, belittle, dismiss, side track and slander the word Feminist and the voice/opinions Feminists.

(Part two coming)

1 So, SO MANY sporting events, political domains, the media, Gentlemen’s clubs like the Australia Club. Compare a male soccer salary to a females, compare the slander of Gillard to Abbott. Tell to me one high powered club the level and prestige of the Australia Club catering exclusively to females and I will eat my hat.

For the second part in this two part series, click here

Advertisements

TRIGGER WARNING: Discussions of rape culture – no graphic descriptions, theory only.
Please do yell at me if you consider this to be out of line. We all wear blinkers and I am always ready to be humbled by others for my opinions.

It appears of late that our rapey rape culture has been rearing it’s ugly face fairly regularly. I’d like to think this is the death throws of it, but I suspect it’s just the beginning of a rather long and gruesome fight.

Most common to the people I’ve been talking to – females and self considered prospective mothers – seem to agree it is important to teach men and boys not to rape but are hesitant to give up talking to girls about how to protect themselves. It’s largely coming from a good place – a place that doesn’t wish to admit that they are powerless to protect their daughters* or that their daughters are powerless to being attacked.

All seem to feel that it’s counter intuitive not to tell their spawn how and why to protect themselves.

There is a LOT on the internet about why talking to your daughter about how to protect herself through dress or action is an act that becomes complicit and adds to the structural violence against victims of rape, but for now I’ve compiled my thoughts on the parents who can’t let this one go.

I feel like the safest rule of thumb is to instead of using the word “should” it is a gentler suggestion to discuss with your child what you “can” do in this situation.

For instance, “you should always leave if you feel unsafe” leaves a very different feeling to “you can leave if you feel unsafe”.

Should someone, god forbid, fall prey to a rapist, the former statement will, in hindsight, resonate regret & embarrassment. “I should have known better”, “I should have listened” – aka, self blame.

The latter, however, resonates far less powerfully.

This alone wont combat the self-blame, but consider this:

“you should always leave if you feel unsafe” is a message that will always directly battle with “it wasn’t your fault”
“You can leave if you feel unsafe” couples far better with “it wasn’t your fault.”

What is done here is pretty simple. Firstly, it’s empowering the person to make a choice. She can do whatever she damn pleases and a constant reminder of this is really positive.

Secondly, it’s informing her of an actual way in which she can take precautions – namely – trusting her instincts and exercising her right to leave.

The third factor is a slight of the hand with regards to the language. One statement – “should” – sets a standard that the woman “should” adhere to. The other statement – “can” – merely lets the woman know of a valid option in which she can take.

I’m a big fan of couching statements away from standards. In a later post I will talk about beauty and discuss with myself ways of approaching it without being problematic – but for the purposes of discussing preventative methods to your daughter, stick to “can” and let her make up her own mind.

Away with standards, present the options.

Also talk to your children about consent. Read up on what it is so as you can explain clearly. Make sure they understand what boundaries are and what they are entitled to.

They are entitled to say “no”. They are not entitled to demand a reason when someone else says “no”.
They are entitled to ask, but they are not entitled to push or demand.
They are entitled to their kinks, but they are not entitled to judge others for their kinks.
They are entitled to respect and be respected, always.

I do CATEGORICALLY DO NOT support telling people that alcohol will put someone in danger of an act that involves another conscious person (as opposed to self inflicted accidents). I DO NOT support telling people to dress a certain way in order to control the actions of others (ridiculous). A persons actions are their own decision and responsibility, always.

At the end of the day, I feel like the conversation with all of your children should be exactly the same. If it’s gendered differently, then you’ve got problems.

(P.s. love you, Sarah)

*/female born children/female identified children. I realise this is a conversation that we actually need to be having with all children, I also recognise the disproportionately large amount of attacks on females and transgendered peoples.